Third Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 16,913
Rizzi et al v. Netflix Inc.
as 1:2024mc00202
Petitioner:
Steven J Rizzi and Robocast Inc.
Respondent:
Netflix Inc.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05391
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MANDAL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
SMRITIMAY MANDAL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Ex Parte Application of SPS I Fundo De
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
SPS I FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO DE ACOES, Investimento no Exterior
Defendant:
COLORADO INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC, DBA Blessed Holdings LLC
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Respondent:
Nokia Technologies Oy, Alcatel Lucent SAS, Nokia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Chapman Chevrolet LLC, et al
as 24-1691
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
CHAPMAN CHEVROLET LLC and GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al
as 24-1690
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, TRANSUNION LLC and others
Nicholas Martino v. USA
as 24-1694
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS K. MARTINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lardizabal et al v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Aidan Lardizabal and Mayra Alejandra Puentes
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
