Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 24,625
IN RE QUINZEL KK CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff: QUINZEL KK CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff: PAUL COHEN
Defendant: COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff: HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant: CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant: BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Nicholas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff: Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant: Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: Dante Burton
Defendant: C.O. Crawford, C.O. Cebrick, Unit Manager Grohowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1823
Plaintiff: ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
Stephen White v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1799
Plaintiff: STEPHEN WHITE
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PHILIP JEDRZEJEK, BILL GOODWIN and others
MCCARY v. SIMCOX et al
as 2:2024cv01922
Plaintiff: CAMERON MCCARY
Defendant: CODY SIMCOX, JOHN DOE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?