Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 598
PETROGIANNIS
as 2:2024cv01795
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETROGIANNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LOMBARDO v. LEONARD et al
as 2:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE LOMBARDO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN LEONARD and IMS TECHNOLOGIES SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
VARGO v. CODDINGTON et al
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARK JONATHAN VARGO
Defendant:
ROBERT CODDINGTON and B.C. ELECTRIC CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WISNIEWSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY LLC
as 2:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE WISNIEWSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WISNIEWSKI v. MARKET STREET CVS, INC. ET AL
as 2:2024cv01235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL v. BURLINGTON COAT FACALITY et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COAT FACALITY, SECURITY GUARD and CLERK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
LEON v. HANOCH et al
as 2:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LEON
Defendant:
NEHAMA HANOCH and CHEYENNE GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MOSLEY v. STARBUCKS
as 2:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
STARBUCKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
JOHNSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
KOKO JOHNSON
Defendant:
SERENA WILLIAMS and ALEXIS OHANIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Godlewski v. Alvear Gonzalez, et al.
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Philip Godlewski
Defendant:
Eduardo Nicolas Alvear Gonzalez, Good Lion Films, L.L.C. and Good Lion TV, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
