U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 82,071
Samuel Whatley v. Medical University of South Carolina
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II
Defendant:
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
Adam Casey v. Nancie Williams
as 24-1371
Plaintiff:
ADAM NICHOLAS CASEY
Defendant:
NANCIE WILLIAMS, D.B.A. Judge "JDR" Warren County Court, Juvenile Domestic Relations and UNKNOWN, Individual at the Court Hearing Representing Department of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Division
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff:
B.J.P.
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
The Travelers Indemnity Company v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, on its own behalf and as Assignee of Surry County, North Carolina
Defendant:
AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Aerotek, Incorporated v. Kenneth Nosky
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
AEROTEK, INCORPORATED and ALLEGIS GROUP, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
KENNETH D. NOSKY
US v. Ronald Jenkins, Jr.
as 24-4220
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD DAMONE JENKINS, JR., a/k/a G, a/k/a GG, a/k/a Gee, a/k/a Gee Gee
US v. Japree Brooks
as 24-4221
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAPREE LORTEZ BROOKS, a/k/a Choppa, a/k/a Khoppa, a/k/a Primo
US v. Thomas Palmer
as 24-4222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS WELDON PALMER, a/k/a Flame, a/k/a Jynx, a/k/a Jynx Da Don
US v. Jamique Mays
as 24-4223
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMIQUE MAYS, a/k/a Eye Tunes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
