District Court Cases in Maryland
Cases 101 - 110 of 76,812
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Francis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Francis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crouse v. First National Bank of Pennsylvania
as 1:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
James Crouse
Defendant:
First National Bank of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607 RESPA: Violation re kickbacks/unearned fees; Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Minton v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01224
Plaintiff:
Eric Minton
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rice v. Meritus Medical Center et al
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Dariush A. Rice
Defendant:
Meritus Medical Center, Maulik Joshi, Dr. Joshua's T. Mclain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Bell v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Tina Bell
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund v. Johnson Peltier Electric
as 8:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND
Defendant:
Johnson Peltier Electric
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
