US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,395
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Nicholson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Locklear et al
as 5:2024ct03110
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Locklear, Nurse P. Pierre, OIC of Seg. Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, Lt. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024hc02095
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02094
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Lebron v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02093
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lebron
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DeLeon v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024ct03107
Plaintiff:
Abel DeLeon
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant:
Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner:
Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
