US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,835
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Huisen v. House of Representatives, et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Greg Van Huisen and Gregory Scott VanHuisen
Defendant:
House of Representatives, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salahuddin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Khalil A Salahuddin
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. White
as 3:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hustead v. Indian Creek Correctional Center
as 2:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Randall Hustead
Defendant:
Indian Creek Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Irving et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Trevelle Alexander Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Antionette Irving and Deputies John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bell v. Page et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell, Sr.
Defendant:
Page, Forton and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, Joshua Branch and B. Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Clay et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Clay and Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
