US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 171 - 180 of 69,044
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Harrison v. RVA Dirt, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tyra Harrison
Defendant:
RVA Dirt, LLC and Becca Duvall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Henry v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Henry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanigan v. Bechtel Global Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Debra Hanigan
Defendant:
Bechtel Global Corporation, Board of Directors of Bechtel Global Corporation and Bechtel Trust & Thrift Plan Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Leonard v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Patricia D Leonard
Defendant:
Cameron D Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
