West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 4,823
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Lionel A. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Merchant v. Gore
as 1:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Brian Merchant
Respondent:
Charles Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Galvan v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00793
Petitioner:
Damian Hernandez-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Torres v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00792
Petitioner:
Juan Torres
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director, Associate Warden Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harden v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00789
Petitioner:
Lakesia L. Harden
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00247
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Byas v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00355
Petitioner:
Deontay Byas
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bortle v. Rodosky
as 1:2023cv00782
Petitioner:
Marcus Ray Bortle
Respondent:
Warden Rodosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moore v. Ray (Warden)
as 5:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Heather Ray (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shands v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Johnny Shands, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
