Fifth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 202
Michael French v. New Hampshire Insurance Co., et al
as 18-10571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Gary Epple v. BNSF Railway Company
as 18-10509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. EPPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
COUCH v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv01229
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Couch
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Acevedo
Defendant:
United States Railroad Retirement Board and Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hilliard v. Natchez Railway, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Roniica Hilliard
Defendant:
Natchez Railway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mero v. National Railroad Adjustment Board et al
as 5:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Pershing Mero, Jr
Defendant:
National Railroad Adjustment Board, Kansas City Southern Railway Co and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Acosta v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anastacio Acosta
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Kevin Horner, et al v. American Airlines, Inc., et al
as 18-10036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN HORNER, JOHN KRAKOWSKI and KEITH BOUNDS
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH TERSTEEG
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED and ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION
Summerlin v. Barrow
as 4:2017cv01016
Defendant:
Robert W Barrow
Plaintiff:
Dale H Summerlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acevedo v. United States Railroad Retirement Board et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Acevedo
Defendant:
United States Railroad Retirement Board , Walter A Barrows , Steven J Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
