US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 12,665
Gash v. Gaspard
as 6:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Darell J Gash
Defendant:
Brentt Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Stearns
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Carpenter, III
Defendant:
Warden Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crosby v. Day
as 5:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Crosby
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallow v. Myers
as 6:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Justin Gallow
Defendant:
Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Louisiana et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Deantwon Taylor
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, 1st District Court, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hooper
as 5:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Phillip Orlando Ealy Johnson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Nunez
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Calcasieu Parish, Calcasieu Parish Correctional Center, Riverbend Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Springhill Police Dept et al
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Timmy Clay Jenkins
Defendant:
Springhill Police Dept, Will Lynd, Rodney Hile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hanrahan v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanrahan
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mayes v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Chaddrick D Mayes
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
