US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 465
Hines v. Oakgrove Retirement Home, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Hines
Defendant:
Oakgrove Retirement Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Coats et al v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Erenne Coats and Justin Smith
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilkes v. Cargill, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Steven C. Wilkes
Defendant:
Cargill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rice v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Brenda Rice
Defendant:
Unum Group and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moore v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 3:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Sherry Moore
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Edwards v. Sydney's Transport LLC
as 3:2021cv00240
Plaintiff:
Melvin Edwards
Defendant:
Sydney's Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burress v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ashley Burress
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walsh v. Jesse's Cleaning Service, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Jesse's Cleaning Service, LLC and Jesse Taliaferro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnson v. Clarksdale Public Utility Authority et al
as 4:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Clarksdale Public Utility Authority, Freddie L. Davis, Jr., James Humber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. GSR Global LGroup Incorporated
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Genesis Walker
Defendant:
GSR Global LGroup Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
