US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 198
Clark v. Kirby et al
as 3:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
William B Clark
Defendant:
Joshua J Kirby , City of Garland Texas and Gary L Steadman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbara Jeanne Altemeier v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2010cv02646
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jeanne Altemeier
Defendant:
Dallas County Texas , City of Dallas Texas , Muskegon County Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kitchen v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2010cv01779
Plaintiff:
Denise Kitchen
Defendant:
Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cannon v. Denton County Sheriff, Denton, Texas
as 3:2010cv01299
Plaintiff:
James E Cannon
Defendant:
Denton County Sheriff, Denton, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Wooderts et al
as 4:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Levi Wooderts, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, Capps, US Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Foster v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster
Defendant:
Dee Anderson, A Hill and Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saif v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
Raed Saif
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, Jose Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregory v. McKennon et al
as 4:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Gregory
Defendant:
C McKennon, J Blackwood, G James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Cockell et al
as 3:2010cv00741
Plaintiff:
Reginald Donell Rice
Defendant:
Carey D. Cockell, Carrie Wright and Lauren Osteen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarmon v. Carswell Federal Medical Center
as 4:2010cv00209
Plaintiff:
Valerie Jarmon
Defendant:
Carswell Federal Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
