US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 32,825
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. USA
as 6:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Romelia Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Juarez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Juarez
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montemayor v. Big Spring Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Frank Montemayor
Defendant:
Big Spring Police Department, Howard County Sheriffs Office, FNU Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Benny L. Cole, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Jim Wesley Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01046
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Orogun v. USA
as 3:2024cv01053
Petitioner:
Collins Orogun
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Braddock v. USA
as 4:2024cv00383
Petitioner:
Brandi Lee Braddock
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
