US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 81 - 90 of 74,211
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galia v. Roundglass, LLC
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Erica Galia
Defendant:
Roundglass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cristo v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cristo
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Telsync Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. W. Kenneth Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
Defendant:
W. Kenneth Paxton and Jane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Of America et al v. Colton
as 5:2023cv01554
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Randall et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Jack Randall and Beverly Randall
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, Cannon Perdue and JP Segura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
J&H Web Technologies, LLC v. Superhuman Labs, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
J&H Web Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Superhuman Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MR Acquisition LLC v. House Cross Management, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
MR Acquisition LLC
Defendant:
House Cross Management, LLC, HCK, LP, H-C Associates, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
