Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 39,820
Washington v. Russ et al
as 4:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Washington
Defendant:
FNU Russ, Lt. FNU Glover, FNU Kelce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coe v. Ewing et al
as 7:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
John M. Ewing, Sherin Dackairaj, Nadia Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Hockley County Jail
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bullock
Defendant:
Hockley County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. 203rd Judicial District Courts et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
203rd Judicial District Courts, US District Court, Fifth Cir Ct of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
BOP and SCFO - TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Nueces County Jail
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Nueces County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Welch, Jr.
as 9:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hall
Defendant:
Thomas H. Welch, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
