Sixth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 281
Assen v. Brian et al
as 2:2015cv02892
Plaintiff:
Johannes Assen
Defendant:
Brian D. Jones, Levi D Wilson, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181
The Distribution Group, Inc., d/b/a Van Eerden Food Service v. Canstrong Food Service, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv12655
Plaintiff:
The Distribution Group, Inc., d/b/a Van Eerden Food Service
Defendant:
Canstrong Food Service, LLC and Gregory Armstrong
Hacker et al v. Farm Service Agency et al
as 1:2015cv00610
Defendant:
Farm Service Agency, Risk Management Agency, American Agricultural Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Hacker and Nancy Hacker
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023
Mastronardi Produce LTD. v. Sunfresh Farms, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Mastronardi Produce LTD.
Defendant:
Sunfresh Farms, Inc., James R. Beale and James E. Beale
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Heeren Brothers, Inc. v. Katz et al
as 1:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Heeren Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:
Sharon Hope Katz, Samuel Katz and Produce Palace International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Economy Produce, Inc. v. New Sheng Hung, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Economy Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
New Sheng Hung, Inc. and Johnny Liang
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
PacificPro, Inc. v. Detroit Wholesale Produce, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv10869
Plaintiff:
PacificPro, Inc.
Defendant:
Detroit Wholesale Produce, LLC , Thomas M. Brisbey and Gregory Serio
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
S & S Marketing and Sales, Inc. v. Melton
as 2:2015cv02160
Plaintiff:
S & S Marketing and Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Neal Melton
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Economy Produce, Inc. v. Jerilu Fruit and Produce Company et al
as 1:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Economy Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
Jerilu Fruit and Produce Company, Barry McCracken and Debbie Constable
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
