Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 9,917
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lamie v. Hoopes et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Ervin Joseph Lamie, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Hoopes, Muskegon, County of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moore v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Moore
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nedelkovski v. Nedelkovski
as 2:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Angela Nedelkovski
Defendant:
Dejan Nedelkovski
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety, Jordan Jacob, Eric Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Marshall v. Walmart Stores East, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dereck Marshall
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cheeks et al v. Dearborn Heights Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11010
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cheeks and G'Kylah Cheeks
Defendant:
Dearborn Heights Police Department, Beardon, Dearborn Heights School District 7 and others
Baksh v. Livingston County Community Mental Health et al
as 2:2024cv10995
Plaintiff:
Christian Baksh
Defendant:
Livingston County Community Mental Health, Connie Conklin and John Does 1-x
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Felkers et al v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Uldis Felkers, Arianne Vega, Leximer Hernandez-Alvarez and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor and Kenneth D. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
