US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,561
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #038 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Doe #038
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #041 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Doe #041
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #040 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
John Doe #040
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
