US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 91 - 100 of 35,428
Dowdy v. Vantell et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Antwion Dowdy
Defendant:
Warden Vincent Vantell, Core Civic, Inc., f/n/u Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC v. CenturyLink Communications, LLC
as 3:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
Defendant:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Rasheem Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Family First Life Fenix Financial v. Parris
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Family First Life Fenix Financial
Defendant:
Darius Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Doe v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Paul Drake Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #062 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Doe #062
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Peone et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Corey Taylor
Defendant:
Brandon Peone, Andre Johnson, Chris Brun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
