Middle District of Tennessee Cases

Cases filed

Cases 41 - 50 of 20,367
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. Schindeldecker et al
as 3:2015cv00543
Plaintiff: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Defendant: Debora Schindeldecker, Megan Schindeldecker, Jessica Schindeldecker and others
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00544
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anthony v. Byrd et al
as 3:2015cv00548
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony
Defendant: Clara Byrd, Robert Hamilton, Linda Neal and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, LLP v. Manley Toys Limited
as 3:2015mc00008
Plaintiff: Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, LLP
Defendant: Manley Toys Limited
Intervenor: Toy Quest Ltd.
Dixon v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00547
Plaintiff: Cedric Dixon
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Steve R. Dozier, Richard R. Rooker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs & Morgan, P.A. v. Manley Toys Limited
as 3:2015mc00009
Plaintiff: Briggs & Morgan, P.A.
Defendant: Manley Toys Limited
Intervenor: Toy Quest Ltd.
Greer v. Day
as 3:2015cv00545
Plaintiff: Johnny Jerome Greer
Defendant: Reggina Day
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv00546
Plaintiff: Rashunus Pearson
Defendant: Marteasha Johnson, Jamaal Boykin, Jeffery Diagle
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Pilot Flying J Litigation II et al v. Pilot Corporation
as 3:2015mc00007
Movant: Pilot Travel Centers LLC
Plaintiff: FST Express, Inc.
Defendant: Pilot Corporation
Hughes v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00536
Plaintiff: David Monroe Hughes
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.