Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 129
Felts v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Felts
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #1 (PTH) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (PTH), John Doe #2 (DMA), John Doe #3 (WCB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (ADD) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
John Doe (ADD)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (OA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
John Doe (OA) and Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (RB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rausch (JRG3)
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (GEA.1) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
John Doe (GEA.1)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe #1 (SLA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 (SLA), Jane Doe #2 (ALW) and John Doe #1 (FB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (MSA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MSA) and John Doe #2 (TRB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
