Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ROBERTSON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv01279
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN D. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER and JAMES W. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CABLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC et al
as 1:2008cv01271
Plaintiff:
THERESA ANNE CABLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC, NURSE ALBRIGHT and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF FRANK ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
West et al v. Timberlake et al
as 2:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
April West, April West, Shenita Horton and others
Defendant:
Karen Timberlake, Karen Timberlake, Jason Helgerson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Maram et al
as 3:2008cv50162
Plaintiff:
Rita Miller
Defendant:
Barry S. Maram and Carol L. Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mack v. Maram et al
as 1:2008cv03127
Plaintiff:
Linda L. Mack and Linda L. Mack
Defendant:
Barry S. Maram and Carol L. Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Circuit Court of Cook County
as 1:2008cv01783
Plaintiff:
Charles I. Thomas
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Rante v. City of Wood Dale, et al
as 08-1539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RANTE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WOOD DALE, KENNETH JOHNSON, individually and MARSHALL SUBACH
Al-Bareh v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00589
Petitioner:
Loui H Al-Bareh
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Keith Nygren and Daniel Sedlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Andreu v. United Parcel Service, Inc.,
as 1:2007cv00473
Plaintiff:
Jose Andreu
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.,, United Parcel Service, Inc., and United Parcel Service, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MILLIGAN v. FINNAN
as 2:2007cv00006
Petitioner:
JONATHAN MILLIGAN
Respondent:
ALAN FINNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
