US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,749
v. Coleman et al
as 1:2024cv01112
Defendant:
Traver Coleman, Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Gist et al
as 3:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Traver Coleman
Defendant:
Harold Gist and City of Virden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Chaplin v. Crowder et al
as 3:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
William Chaplin
Defendant:
Ryan Crowder, Steven Snyder, David Greenwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Curry v. Dollar General et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Celeste J Curry
Defendant:
Dollar General, Alexis Chaplain, Laura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Sarah Kerley, Erin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
