US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Farrell v. Hester
as 4:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
Kalief K Farrell
Defendant:
Jarred Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. National Alliance for Mental Illness
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
National Alliance for Mental Illness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Chicago Behavioral Hospital
as 1:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Chicago Behavioral Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnston v. Lemasters et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Audrey Lemasters, . Singh, Cody Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Henry's On Main LLC v. Village of Rochester et al
as 3:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Henry's On Main, LLC and Henry's On Main LLC
Defendant:
Village of Rochester and Joseph Suerdieck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Libaia Nseya v. Kraft Heinz Food Company
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Libata Nseya
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Food Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
