US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 192
BARRETT v. THOROUGHBRED TRANSPORTATION INC.
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. BARRETT
Defendant:
Thoroughbred Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HERTOG v. BAPTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
LOIS HERTOG
Defendant:
BAPTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
NEELEY v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01887
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. NEELEY, JR.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
CREASON v. ELANCO US INC.
as 1:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON CREASON
Defendant:
ELANCO US INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
POULSON v. PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
ALLISON POULSON
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC., FRITO-LAY, INC. and PEPSICO, INC. d/b/a PFS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chase et al
as 1:2021cv01897
Plaintiff:
Cindy Chase and Gaylor Electric Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SIMPSON v. APEX EXPRESS, INC.
as 1:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robert Simpson
Defendant:
Apex Express, Inc. d/b/a Cordell Transportation Company, LLC and APEX EXPRESS, INC. doing business as CORDELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
WERNLE YOUTH & FAMILY TREATMENT CENTER v. BUTLER et al
as 1:2021cv00614
Defendant:
ATLANTA NATIONAL PROCESSING CENTER, MARK BUTLER and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff:
WERNLE YOUTH & FAMILY TREATMENT CENTER and WERNLE YOUTH AND FAMILY TREATMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SERIO v. FLYNN RESTAURANT GROUP
as 1:2020cv03026
Plaintiff:
Rodney Serio
Defendant:
Flynn Restaurant Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
