US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 192
TAYLOR v. AARONS, INC.
as 1:2014cv02002
Defendant:
AARONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BARMES v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BARMES
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
STARK v. PERI FORMWORK SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2014cv01736
Defendant:
PERI FORMWORK SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAWKINS v. ONSITE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY, INC.
as 3:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
LAURA E. HAWKINS
Defendant:
ONSITE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
BURKARD v. JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION
as 1:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
SERENA BURKARD
Defendant:
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HENSLEY et al v. DOLGENCORP, INC.
as 1:2014cv00435
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HENSLEY and TAMMY HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
STOVER v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LLC
as 1:2014cv00407
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BATES v. AMERIPATH KENTUCKY, INC.
as 1:2014cv00344
Defendant:
AMERIPATH KENTUCKY, INC.
Plaintiff:
NIKITA BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JOHNSON v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
DARIN B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BOOHER v. CERES SOLUTIONS LLP
as 1:2013cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BOOHER
Defendant:
CERES SOLUTIONS LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
