US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,595
Green v. Milwaukee Circuit Court
as 2:2024cv00295
Petitioner:
Mitchell D Green
Respondent:
Milwaukee Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Semons v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Floyd L Semons
Respondent:
Chris Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Brown
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
William McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell, Greg Giese, Angela Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingers v. Suter
as 2:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Dean J Wingers
Respondent:
Christine Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. DeHann
as 2:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Pierre Gardner and Pierre Douglas Gardner
Respondent:
Sue DeHann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Arshpreet Singh
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
