Missouri Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 12,041
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams-Goode et al v. Division of Youth Services
as 4:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode and S.B.
Defendant:
Division of Youth Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams et al v. Elmore et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rosetta Williams and Andrea Covington
Defendant:
Terry Elmore, Dylan Stevens and City of Hayti, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Williams-Goode et al v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams-Goode, S.B., D.W. and others
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Larken Alexander
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattison v. Platte County R-3 School District et al
as 5:2024cv06052
Plaintiff:
Betsy Mattison
Defendant:
Platte County R-3 School District, Aaron Duff and Chris Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Meier v. Degase
as 6:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Aaron Meier
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Degase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
