US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 81 - 90 of 122,534
State Farm General Ins. Co. v. Broan-Nutune, LLC
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Broan-Nutone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
(PS) Peek v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Keith Peek
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Kathy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Umberger et al v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
George P. Umberger, II, Lisabeth A. King and Savannah R. Bailey
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Dayton v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Dayton
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Nathan Strickland, Frank Piro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Corona v. City of Rocklin et al
as 2:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Cameron Corona
Defendant:
City of Rocklin and Jeffrey Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lowe v. Liberty 1 Mortgage, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Casey Lowe
Defendant:
Liberty 1 Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(HC) Dean v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
David Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Hopson v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Ryan Joel Hopson
Defendant:
Sergeant G. Chavez, Commander Thomas, Corporal Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ngo v. Romero, et al.
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Chi Thanh Ngo
Defendant:
Manuel Romero, Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
