US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26,346
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Limon et al
as 3:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
Cameron L. Haywood
Defendant:
Efren Limon and Ogwurumba Casmir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Tracy Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, J. Moeckly and C. Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02769
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation and Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Dr. White, Rachel Chen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
