US District Court for the District of Montana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 223
STAIGMILLER v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv00119
Defendant:
SECANT MEDICAL, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, PRODESCO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARLENE STAIGMILLER and Gail Shephard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potter v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kim Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Depuy Synthes Products Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Depuy Synthes Products Inc., Medical Device Business Services, Inc. and Depuy Synthes Sales Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alvin Barry Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roundine v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Laura Roundine
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaparich v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kaparich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barton v. Arrow Striping & Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Arrow Striping & Manufacturing, Inc., Skip-Line, LLC and Does 1 through 30
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knudson v. Paws Up Ranch, LLC
as 9:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Paws Up Ranch, LLC
Plaintiff:
Traci L. Knudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Philp v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00035
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jerald Philp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dalbotten v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Maria Dalbotten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Josh Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.