Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,246
Mezquita Vega v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv00605
Petitioner:
Sonia L Mezquita Vega
Respondent:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05332
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hart v. Department of Corrections Washington State
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Joseph William Hart
Respondent:
Department of Corrections Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eytcheson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Franklin Gene Eytcheson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
Tayan Jackson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norton v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Daniel Norton
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarette v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Jorge J Navarette
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
