U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,047
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Sorak v. Cisneros, et al
as 24-1170
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SORAK
Defendant:
THERESA CISNEROS, in her official capacity of Senior Judge, AMANDA BRADLEY, in her official capacity as Magistrate and COLORADO JUDICIAL BRANCH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Salgado v. Smith
as 24-2068
Plaintiff:
ANGELIC SALGADO, as personal representative of the Wrongful Death Estate of Jonathan Molina
Defendant:
KEVIN SMITH, in his individual capacity
Sethunya v. TikTok, et al
as 24-4045
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA SETHUNYA
Defendant:
TIKTOK, INC., C3780792 TIKTOK, INC., META PLATFORMS, INC. and others
Krueger, et al v. Orr, et al
as 24-7037
Plaintiff:
JOHN KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger and PAMELA KRUEGER, individually and as Co-Administrator of the Estate of Jeffery Krueger
Defendant:
NICHOLAS ORR, individually, DREW CRAIG, individually, TYLER MCFARLAND, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
