U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 247
Andrew R Allred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12331
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW R ALLRED
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Paul Anthony Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11941
Petitioner / Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Harry Franklin Phillips v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11606
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY FRANKLIN PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Anthony Esposito v. Warden GDP
as 22-11538
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY ESPOSITO
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Robert Shawn Ingram v. Warden Holman CF
as 22-11459
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT SHAWN INGRAM
Respondent / Appellee:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Leon Tollette v. Warden GDCP
as 22-11440
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEON TOLLETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Richard Sealey v. Warden Georgia Diagnostic Prison
as 22-11040
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L SEALEY
Respondent / Appellee:
GDCP WARDEN
Jesse Guardado v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-10957
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE GUARDADO
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
David Miller, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-10657
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MILLER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ellis Louis Mashburn, Jr. v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-10329
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELLIS LOUIS MASHBURN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
