US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,786
Ramos-Ramos v. Cohen (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos-Ramos and Pedro J. Ramos-Ramos
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cobb v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Shatarious Ramone Cobb
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodson v. Morgan (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andre Goodson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carden v. Howell et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Michael Howell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baggott v. Cohen (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Robert Baggott
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Morgan (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porch v. McClain (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Deonte Anton Porch
Defendant:
Antonio McClain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hutchinson v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Fitzgerald Hutchinson
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Givand v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Terrence Learnest Givand
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree and Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Laman
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant:
David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
