US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 3,657
Howard v. Bailey
as 7:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jason P. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Shears et al
as 1:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Tavars D Lynch
Defendant:
Danny Shears, Alton Craft, Tim Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Cruz et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Charles William Hatcher, Jr
Defendant:
Isaac Cruz, Lara M Alvis, Jill Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Defendant:
Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stanberry v. Ivy
as 2:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Derrick Michael Stanberry
Defendant:
Kay Ivy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Madison County Alabama Circuit Court et al
as 5:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Charles Randolph Clemons
Defendant:
Madison County Alabama Circuit Court and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Lisa et al
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Gray
Defendant:
Lisa, J Burnum, Public Defenders Office of Shelby County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Kavli et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Randal B McCoy
Defendant:
Kavli and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State of Alabama et al
as 7:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Donell Curry
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Reform Alabama City Police Department, Pickens County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Pell City Police Division et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Randal McCoy
Defendant:
Pell City Police Division and Pell City Municipal Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
