US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,651
Hambric v. Twilley et al
as 6:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Chris Hambric
Defendant:
Kolby Twilley and Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County and Bud Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Surles v. Bell
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Mr Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pride v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Cornellius Darell Pride
Defendant:
Sheriff Kevin Turner and Brittany Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Wade
as 2:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Trevion T Clark
Defendant:
Sheriff Micheal Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Rodgers
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Tara Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Broussard
as 5:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Cable
Defendant:
Madison County Probation & Parole Department, Bridget McGraw, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
as 7:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkins
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Horton, et al
as 7:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Mario Maldonado Moreno
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, Chief Administrator Bullock, Captain XFord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
