US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,654
Reed v. BBVA-PNC Bank
as 4:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Marshall Van Reed
Defendant:
BBVA-PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Morrow
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Connie J Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Madison County Courthouse
as 5:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Tesheal Stewart
Defendant:
Madison County Courthouse, Debra Kizer, Benjamin Edward Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Goodwin
Defendant:
Russ Sanders, District Attorney Jett, Sheriff Max Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renney v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Renney
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Commissioner John Hamm, Commissioner Jeff Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boykin v. Fox
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Travaris Rashad Boykin
Defendant:
Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. Robinson et al
as 4:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Alfie Coats
Defendant:
Cody D. Robinson and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aloba v. Department of Justice
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Aloba
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Lt. Fleeton, D.
as 2:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Lt. D. Fleeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. St. Clair County Jail
as 4:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Willie Mitchell Taylor
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
