US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 2,080
Carwie v. Mobile County et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
J. Gregory Carwie
Defendant:
Mobile County, Alabama, Sam Cochran and Noah Price "Tre Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carwie v. Mobile County et al
as 1:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
J. Gregory Carwie
Defendant:
Mobile County, Sam Cochran and Noah Price (Trey) Oliver, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Spraggins et al
as 1:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Brendon L. Thomas
Defendant:
Meredith Spraggins, Jessica Calloway, Abbey Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Boone v. Baldwin County
as 1:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lee Boone
Defendant:
Baldwin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Brendon L. Thomas
Defendant:
Dee Smith and Alabama Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billingsley v. Kiwanis Club National Fair
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Kiwanis Club National Fair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
