Arizona Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,209
Carrillo v. Comenity Capital Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank, Caesar's Casino, Harrah's Ak-Chin Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Katie Hobbs and Bradley D Beauchamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. F-N-F Construction et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
F-N-F Construction, Zurich Insurance Company, Katie Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Libuser v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2024cv08072
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland Libuser
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Sentry Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Sentry Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Kohl's et al
as 2:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Kohl's, Maria Carrillo, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
