US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,749
Hunsucker v. Karren et al
as 5:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Heath Lee Hunsucker
Defendant:
Judge Brad Karren and Deputy Prosecutor Kelsey Six
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
as 3:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
Angela Williams
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Kennemore et al
as 4:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Hal R. Lewis
Defendant:
Police Chief Boyd Kennemore, Sergeant Casey Fleming and Patrolman Christon Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tully v. Le et al
as 5:2023cv05155
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Tully, Jr.
Defendant:
Dustin Le and Klayton Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Blake Jones
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, Benton County, Allan Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
