US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 326
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vaughn v. The State of Arkansas / ADC
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Walter Earnest Vaughn, III
Respondent:
The State of Arkansas / ADC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ybarra v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04026
Petitioner:
Amber Ybarra
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. Easley
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Thomas Fleming
Respondent:
Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Western District of Arkansas)
as 6:2024cv06034
Petitioner:
Jeffery William Paul
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Payne
as 6:2024cv06031
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04022
Petitioner:
Travis Cain Lewis
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Easley
as 4:2024cv04016
Petitioner:
Malcolm C. Mack
Respondent:
Warden Jeffie Walker and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fitts v. Klatt
as 3:2024cv03011
Petitioner:
Colby Blake Fitts
Respondent:
Sheriff Daniel Klatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McElroy v. Doe
as 5:2024cv05031
Plaintiff:
Jerel McElroy
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
