US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,122
Hernandez v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv01295
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Ryan Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv01292
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilkins v. People of California
as 4:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Keith Wilkins
Defendant:
People of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quine v. Ola et al
as 4:2024cv01202
Petitioner:
Shiloh Heavenly Quine and Rodney James Quine
Respondent:
A. Ola, A. De La Cruz and A. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McKevie v. State of California
as 3:2024cv01172
Petitioner:
Demarius McKevie
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Monterey County Jail
as 3:2024cv01174
Petitioner:
Ismael Valdez
Respondent:
Monterey County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Schuyler et al
as 3:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Ruben Morales Gonzalez, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Charles Schuyler and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Eggers
as 3:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Ismael Valdez
Respondent:
M. Eggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francis v. McKinney
as 3:2024cv01140
Petitioner:
Ocean Maite Francis
Respondent:
Warden A. Dulgov and Warden Nancy McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonilla
as 4:2024cv01101
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
