US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,129
Holland v. Jonsen
as 4:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Christopher Melvin Holland
Respondent:
Sheriff Robert Johnson and Shefiff Robert Jonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Preetorius v. Dulgov
as 3:2024cv00366
Petitioner:
Regina Marie Preetorius
Respondent:
A. Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Howell v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kareen Jabbar Howell
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Petitioner:
Kareem Jabbar Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Macomber
as 3:2024cv00424
Petitioner:
Jarey Stewart
Respondent:
Warden Jeffrey Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla
as 4:2024cv00370
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Schuyler
as 4:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Melvin Allen, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Borla
as 3:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Jasper Bailey
Respondent:
Ron E. Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Govenor Greg Abbott, State Bar of Texas and others
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Dulgov
as 4:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Shawana D. Harris
Respondent:
Warden A. Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sandoval v. Covello
as 5:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Richard Sandoval
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
