US District Court for the Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 12,072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguon v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fitzhugh v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Fitzhugh
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Hairston v. Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
M. Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Zhang et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Michael Dean
Defendant:
Dr. Zhang, Dr. Roberts, John & Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaiser v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaiser
Defendant:
Jon Doe 1, Jon Doe 2, Ruby Gonzalas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Akil Saeed Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Moran-Munoz v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Javier Moran-Munoz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
