US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,584
BREWSTER v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
GEORGE WALTER BREWSTER, III
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. MCMILLEN
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MCMILLEN and WARDEN MCMILLIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
HUGH ZACHARY WATSON
Respondent:
SOUTH GEORGIA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DILLS
as 5:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
TRACY M JONES
Respondent:
ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PERRY
as 1:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KELVIN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VEAL v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
ERIC DEMETRIUS VEAL
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WILKINSON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STYLES v. ODUM
as 7:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
DERRICK STYLES
Respondent:
WARDEN ROY ODUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLATER v. WARDEN AT COASTAL
as 5:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARK SLATER
Defendant:
WARDEN AT COASTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MACK v. CARR
as 5:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
STEVE MACK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
