US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 2,584
PHILLIPS v. PAULK
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
ERIC DEWAYNE PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OBEGINSKI v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00154
Petitioner:
AARON OBEGINSKI
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
EDWARD PERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SISTRUNK v. COUNTRYMAN
as 4:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK
Respondent:
Sheriff GREGORY COUNTRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, CALVIN PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARBER v. TELFAIR STATE PRISON
as 1:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
DANIEL BARBER
Respondent:
TELFAIR STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EDWARDS v. GILLIS
as 7:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
PHIRRONNIUS EDWARDS
Respondent:
Warden SHAWN GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TOOMER v. ADAMS
as 1:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
KASAEM BERNARD TOOMER
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden ROBERT ADAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
