Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 39,533
Batten v. McBurney
as 1:2024cv01667
Plaintiff:
Emory Batten
Defendant:
Judge McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mywan D. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Weems v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant:
JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
