Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 39,561
Rice v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Unit Manager Porter and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chadwick v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Chadwick
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. City of Savannah et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonio Howard
Defendant:
City of Savannah, State of Georgia, Judge Lousie Abbot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Spaulding v. Dillman
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kwame Dalas Spaulding
Defendant:
S. Dillman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt, Jr. v. State Of Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Georgia and Superior Court Judge Penny Feeseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
